“The ideology, strategy, and tactics of Jihad has constituted throughout history a fundamental part of Islamic Jurisprudence and literature, since it is through jihad that the Islamic community developed and expanded.”
She highlights a three point historical blueprint used for centuries to secure the fall and Islamization of earlier Christian societies throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe, and how these constituents eventually subdued the majority host populations:
1- As a result of “wars, conquests, temporary peace treaties, terror like practices and alliances” There was a “gradual erosion of resistance within societies targeted but not yet conquered by jihad.”
2- “Insecurity caused by the constant mass immigration of foreign populations and the subsequent process of alteration and substitution of one civilization by another, hostile to the indigenous inhabitants.”
3- The emergence of powerful collaborationist parties economically and politically linked with Muslim Rulers.”
Wars, conquests, temporary peace treaties, alteration of host societies, terror attacks, emigration, gradual erosion. Sound familiar?
Keeping in mind, this book was first published in 2005, the author is not referencing today’s monumental mass immigration into Europe but those of earlier migrations subsequent to the Second World War. The intent of this hijra is unmistakable. It can be traced back to the dawn of the Muslim era and codified by the the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah in 628 AD. This one event set the criteria, the pattern for international relations between Muslims and the Kafir (anyone not a Muslim) to this very day.
The Treaty was between Muhammad from Medina on the Arabian peninsular and another tribe opposed to Muhammad, the Quraish from Mecca. It was intended to end years of strife and warfare between the two sides subsequent to Muhammad’s banishment from Mecca. In part It acknowledged: A 10 year truce; allowed for Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca whence originally they came; offered the Quraish the option of conversion.
Hudaybiyyah, quoted throughout the centuries is a traditional source of pride to Muslims; it’s been their rendering for conquest of non-Muslim lands for millennia. Facing pposition to the Treaty by some within his group, Muhammad allayed fears by promising “great booty” in the near future. True to his men, not so the Quraish, within two years Muhammad abrogated the treaty and conquered the city. Why is this relevant today?
As the archetype of Islamic conquest, Hudaybiyyah contains all the elements utilized in jihad to sap the strength of an indigenous population until it breaks: incessant hostility; terror tactics; 10 year truces; mass emigration; exhaustion of host resources. This tried and true approach will become the death knell for modern Europe. Consonant with other aforementioned considerations, mass immigration by foreign Muslim populations is once again leading to one civilization, the Muslims, replacing another, Christians, Jews, and all other “non-believers” on the continent.
Permeated with guilt never shared for their Jewish inhabitants, the European Union (EU) is finally beginning to realize they have opened up the gates of their own demise. Efforts have begun to stem this unprecedented avalanche of Islamic immigration. According to an article in the Gatestone Institute International Policy Council: “Germany’s Muslim Demographic Revolution,”
- “There are 20 million refugees waiting at the doorstep of Europe.”
- Mosque attendance in Germany has doubled.
- Muslim men “routinely take advantage of the social welfare system by bringing two, three or four women from across the Muslim world to Germany and are married by an Imam.” In accordance with Muslim doctrine the wealth of a country is degraded and usurped as:
- The married women demand social welfare benefits, including the cost of a separate home for themselves and for their children, on the claim of being a “single parent with children.
It’s worth quoting in full a requiem by Victor Orban, the President of Hungary:
“For us today, what is at stake is Europe, the lifestyle of European citizens, European values, the survival or disappearance of European nations, and more precisely formulated, their transformation beyond recognition. Today, the question is not merely in what kind of a Europe we would like to live, but whether everything we understand as Europe will exist at all.”
A prescient observation by a man recognizing the handwriting on the wall. Orban acknowledges the insidiousness of this uncompromising, messianic movement and how it seeks not only eradication of host culture but its history as well.
Across his border, German Interior Minister, Thomas de Maiziere stated on August 19, “800,000 Islamic refugee migrants are slated to enter Germany in 2015; a 4 fold increase over 2014.”….the equivalent of nearly 1% of its total population. Orban concluded:
“Many of the migrants are from the Middle East and North Africa, a large number (40%) are from countries in the Balkans, including Albania and Kosovo. This implies that nearly half of those arriving in Germany are economic migrants, not refugees fleeing war zones.”
Germany is not alone and this is not new news. According to the latest 2015 Pew Research Center research, the demographics of this latest migration breaks down the following way:
With an additional 1.5 million Islamic “refugees” expected to stream across the continent this year; 81%, 35 or younger, the alarm has finally gone off. The European Commission and Turkey have agreed on a plan to stem the flow of refugees to Europe by patrolling Turkey’s frontier with Greece and setting up new camps, but in lieu of factors already mentioned, it appears too late for Christian Europe to recover. Indeed all signs suggest the next 25 to 50 years will see the inevitable displacement and Islamization of Europe’s Christian population. The predominant question to many minds is: How did this happen? Who made the pivotal decisions to allow such unrestricted immigration onto the continent?
On October 2, 2014 Switzerland voted to limit mass immigration thru its borders. Rather than follow its lead, European officials registered “regret” over the results of this referendum. “There will be consequences, that’s clear,” demurred Luxembourg foreign minister Jean Asselborn. German foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier chimed in, “Switzerland has rather damaged itself with this result.” Not to be outdone, French Foreign Minister, Laurent Fabius stated the vote was “bad news for Europe.” One year later, arguably the greatest proponent of Middle Eastern immigration, German Chancellor, Angela Merkel is facing what the Wall Street Journal refers to as a “Revolt over Migrants.”
Speaking in Eastern Germany this past week it was difficult for her to ignore a man holding a poster that read, “stop the refugee chaos. Preserve German culture and values. Topple Merkel.” By all accounts it may be too late for such sentiments. Reports have it Sharia courts presided by Muslim “peace judges” now dot Germany, where even non-Muslim German judges in German courts cite Sharia law and quote from the Quran.
In 2011, Vienna’s High Court upheld a court conviction of a woman, Elisabeth-Wolff for making this factual statement about Muhammad:
“We all know that Muhammad married Aisha when she was 6 years old and consummated the marriage when she was 9. Now, what do we call this behavior if not pedophilia.”
This is the moribund state Europe is in today. At least the fabled denizens of Troy had only to contend with one Trojan Horse, not so Europe today; many have already breached their gates. Greeting these new arrivals are the progeny of earlier emigres usurping the lifeblood and culture of their new homeland.